It's because of the endless shrimp!  Except it isn't.
https://www.eater.com/24160929/red-lobster-bankruptcy-endless-shrimp-closing-locations


-----Original Message-----
From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Robert
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 4:08 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MoviePass documentary

What VC invest in flows back and forth. Most partners in vc come from the ranks 
of the companies the vc invested in and that then profited the vc's back and 
made the future partners rich.  So the "method of success" 
depends upon the experience of the jr. partners and what they decide to put $$ 
in is related to their risk experience.   Facebook had _no_ method of 
monetization for the first 4 years.  They were just given runway and cash to 
expand with the understanding that it was so compelling and sticky that pulling 
$$ out of the enormous user base would be easy to generate $$ when the time 
came.  VC "harvest"  $$ from their investments after IPO.  They understand that 
they hold enough shares to trigger runs on stocks if they pull out too fast 
after IPO Typical harvests are over 10 years and after that they care little 
about the companies.  Until then they are very involved.  ( Look at when google 
was turned back over to the founders. ) ..


So "burning piles of cash" goes in and out of style.


Streaming is a whole separate animal due to all the ways that the content is 
tied into legal knots.  Look at the streaming companies and most are tied to 
major content companies already so as to secure the content through legacy 
agreements.   VC wants little to do with that pile of crap.  They got burned 
out on that 15 years ago.  You have to have a very special proprietary key to 
that lock for them to be interested and proof that the key fits the lock.


I've gone the VC route 3 times as part of exec teams.   Once 40 years ago when 
I didn't ask for enough to show I knew my head from my ass...
25 years ago when I was hooked to a company because of my "rep" and watched us 
( me included ) try to sell BPG optimization as a major company possibility.  
And prior to that as part of a team that was looking for second round for a 
collaboration tool.  That was hard as the users already liked the product but 
it was in a downturn in VC funding and everything was getting rejected.

The hardest part of vc funding is that they are like sheep, when one goes a 
particular direction they all go that direction.  When one company gets known 
as "hot" they all chomp at the bit to fund, otherwise it's  horrible what they 
do to the companies.   They won't sign NDA's, share info under the table, do 
stuff that should get them in front of the FTC.   "Investors" are still pretty 
much run by the VC's IMNSHO.. Just more through the back doors and buddy 
system...  Because after you get the little $$ out of the way you run into the 
ones with the deep pockets and those are run by the VC's...

On 6/3/24 10:45 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> The old saying is "lose money on every sale but make it up on volume".  The 
> new equivalent is "fake it 'til you make it".  Amazon is the classic example 
> of one that worked out.  Many have a non obvious revenue model that involve 
> selling ads or customer data, that's how TV manufacturers can sell TVs at 
> cost.
>
> But investors seem to be losing patience with business plans that just burn 
> piles of cash with no plan to ever become profitable.  This seems to have hit 
> streaming companies, which everyone assumes are all profitable, but actually 
> most are not.
>
> MoviePass seems to have been doomed, as was WeWork.  There was Theranos.  
> Seems like there is a blurred line between "fake it 'til you make it" and 
> outright scams and pyramid schemes.  All of us can attest that you need to 
> ramp up to a certain number of customers to achieve economies of scale, but 
> it should be possible to show some math how that leads to eventual 
> profitability.  Otherwise you're like the underpants gnomes.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5ih_TQWqCA
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Robert
> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 11:52 AM
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MoviePass documentary
>
> I consulted for three VC's after Nscp and L3...  The wisdom in their thoughts 
> at the time was a home run in one out of 20 was doing well... Their thoughts 
> about founders was about 1/3 idea and 2/3 the ability of the founder to 
> gather talent around them...   Your rolodex was as important as your 
> execution...  Seed money is easy.   A good presentation deck and glib tongue. 
>   Getting money for the first round isn't that hard.   Getting the second 
> round was the test of your business. 1MM seed, 4-10MM first, unicorns got 
> 100MM for second, and the sky was the limit on the 3rd...
>
> On 6/3/24 7:18 AM, dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote:
>> " ...the startups that light piles of money on fire until it runs out 
>> seem to be actively flying the plane into the dirt.  Maybe they have 
>> golden parachutes."
>>
>> If at first you don't succeed, try and try again.
>>
>> I read a quote from one of those zillionaire entrepreneurs that he 
>> had to fail at seven businesses before he hit it big with one.  So I 
>> guess it takes a lot of practice to get it right.  My question is how 
>> did he get investment the 8th time after having those seven failures 
>> on his rap sheet?  Or the 2nd-7th time for that matter.  That's gotta 
>> be somebody with connections in the good-ol-boys network.
>>
>> If investors would just give me 8 chances at startups I'm sure I 
>> could be a self-made zillionaire too.
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
>> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 6:42 PM
>> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MoviePass documentary
>>
>> That'll buff out.
>>
>> Or if you're a Monty Pyton fan, "It's just a flesh wound".
>>
>> Or if you've watched Roadkill on Motor Trend TV, "Dzus it back on".
>>
>> The pilots here can tell me if there's really an expression CFIT 
>> (Controlled Flight Into Terrain).  But I think that's supposed to be 
>> unintentional, whereas the startups that light piles of money on fire 
>> until it runs out seem to be actively flying the plane into the dirt.
>> Maybe they have golden parachutes.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Bill Prince
>> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 3:27 PM
>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MoviePass documentary
>>
>> Bet that smarts.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 5/31/2024 10:09 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>> fly the plane into the ground
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>


--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to