In my experience the FS optics seem to have a bit less of a quality standard. I have had them fail at a higher rate than any other. I would especially recommend against them if they are not being installed in a climate controlled environment. If you do make sure you order the industrial not commercial rated ones. I go through a massive amount of optics when considering the ones I use for myself and all the installs I do for my customers. The ones I see the least failures on are the vendor specific, Integra, Finisar, Solid these I rarely see DOA and have few failures in the field. Next group would Be Precision, FlexOptix, eoptolink, OPlink, mikrotik. Might get 1 in 100 fail OTB and another 1-2 out of 100 fail in the first year. Ones to stay away from are OSI, 10Gtek, FS, Ubnt these I have received entire shipment or 20+ fail OTB and are the ones I see most removed and replaced.

On 1/26/2022 1:36 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
We have used both FS, FlexOptix, and SolidOptics.

All have been good, I just tend not to trust the FS optics as much as the others on the more critical links.

Mark


On Jan 26, 2022, at 1:44 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:

I've heard good things about Flex Optix.

I've been doing FS myself (cheaper).  I've had no issues so far.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:40 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:

    The manufacturers supply a ‘programmer box’ that usually have a
    USB connector, a SFP slot, and some software to reprogram the
    SFP’s.   The software usually lets you set how the SFP identifies
    itself to the switch / router so that you can work around the
    asinine vendors that insist on locking to vendor specific optics,
    and to set the frequency on the tunable optics.

    https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox.html?395=1357&co9424=
    <https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox.html?395=1357&co9424=> for
    example.   They will send one for free if you order optics from them.

    Mark

    On Jan 26, 2022, at 8:25 AM, dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote:

    How do you tune the tunable optics?  Is it done in the config of
    the router, or do you tune it before installing somehow?
    *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh
    *Sent:* Tuesday, January 25, 2022 9:33 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] CWDM vs DWDM, Single Fiber vs Dual fiber
    We spare with tunable optics.   Production is channel specific
    but spares are tunable to the frequency.   Price is usually 4x
    the fixed optics, but as you noted, having to spare every
    channel gets pricy.
    Mark


    On Jan 25, 2022, at 7:57 PM, dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote:
    My recollection is the DWDM optics are slightly cheaper, but
    the CWDM muxes are cheaper.  I think if you fully populate the
    CWDM MUX then the cost was a wash and it didn’t matter which
    one you bought.  If you are only ever going to use a few
    channels then CWDM is noticeably cheaper.
    The biggest hassle IMO is inventory and spares.  If you’re
    using 10 different color optics then you need 10 different
    spares on the shelf.   If you use 40 colors that cost $400 each
    then you need $16,000 in spare optics.  That’s not even a bad
    scenario.  Some of the more exotic optics are $2300 from Fiber
    Store.  I have a quote in hand for 80km 100G Arista branded
    optics from another vendor for over $6000.  If you’re using
    multiple colors of those then you may find yourself with a
    whole lotta capital tied up in spare parts.
    *From:*AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com>*On Behalf Of*Carl Peterson
    *Sent:*Tuesday, January 25, 2022 4:43 PM
    *To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
    *Subject:*[AFMUG] CWDM vs DWDM, Single Fiber vs Dual fiber
    We are leasing a few new strands of dark to a couple
    locations.  On our other paths we have just Done BiDi for our
    ring or payload and used another for our routed/management
    network.  For these strands, I'm thinking of doing passive WDM.
    Any benefit to DWDM vs CWDM if you aren't expecting to scale
    it?  Why would you use two strands vs one strand?  We generally
    use one strand for everything, either BiDi or GPON so my brain
    just sort of assumes that.  What am I missing?
    --
    https://www.fs.com/products/43711.html?attribute=4364&id=297095
    <https://www.fs.com/products/43711.html?attribute=4364&id=297095>
    --
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
    <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to