I would assume CEPH takes the physical disks from each host and combines
them into one logical storage for use by the entire cluster?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 7:39 AM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> CEPH kind of fills the void where you don't need a dedicated, shared
> storage box.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
> *To: *af@af.afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, September 28, 2020 7:34:14 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Virtual machines
>
> If you're going to have multiple physical VM hosts then fast shared
> storage is very helpful.  When you want to reboot a physical machine for OS
> upgrade and the VM's are on shared storage then you can migrate them off
> that box in a few seconds.   Do your maintenance, reboot, migrate VM's
> back.  No downtime.
> On 9/27/2020 11:43 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>
> Thanks guys. Proxmox didn't even come up in my searches. I'll look into
> it. If anyone really knows the space and wouldn't mind spending 15 minutes
> discussing what we need I would appreciate it.
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020, 10:21 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> VMs are a great way to go depending on the job(s) you need to do. As it
>> happens a lot of jobs (e.g. DNS) are not particularly compute intensive, so
>> it's a great way to stretch resources. We find we can run 3 or 4 virtual
>> machines on each physical machine.
>>
>> We used VMware from the get-go, but did not get many of the paid-for
>> bells and whistles. VMware can become pretty expensive, where other
>> solutions (e.g. Proxmox) has an advantage because of open source.
>>
>> The other consideration is containers, which can be thought of as
>> VM-lite. Containers provide almost all of the advantages of VMs with a
>> significantly lighter load on the hardware. As a result, you can load up
>> more applications on less hardware. The leading contender in the container
>> space is Kubernetes and it's also open source.
>>
>> Pick your poison with someone you know who can go over your requirements.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 9/27/2020 7:27 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>
>> I have decided I needed to get on the VM train. I know, I am only 15
>> years behind. Honestly, till now I haven't had a compelling reason.
>>
>> I want something that will at least do some monitoring of VM's, backups,
>> snapshots, etc. Managed upgrading would be great but not as big a priority
>> for me (at least I don't think so).
>>
>> Since I don't know what I don't know, I am asking the experienced crowd.
>>
>> It seems the two real choices are VMWare and Zen. Are there others?
>> Commercial support seems nice, is it worth paying for? What I will run is
>> important for sure.
>>
>> I spent a few hours last night and I more confused now than when I
>> started.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


-- 
Lewis Bergman
325-439-0533 Cell
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to