Yes, it's wrong. We have seen slight improvements on both sector capacity/throughput and frame utilization. Cambium has always said you would see a slight improvement.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:22 AM David Sovereen via AF <af@af.afmug.com> wrote: > Was I misinformed? I was told that replacing ePMP 2000 APs with ePMP 3000 > APs would have zero effect on capacity without changing out SMs to ePMP > 3000 series SMs. Is that wrong? > > Dave > > > On Sep 24, 2020, at 9:51 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > We did a 1000 to 3000L swap on Tuesday morning. Noticing the same thing - > more capacity and much less frame utilization. I think there were 36 SM - > mostly force 200 but some elevate/300-25. > > Josh Luthman > 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:10 PM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > >> We replaced an EPMP2k AP with an EPMP3k AP yesterday. Both had BSA >> attached, Same RF Channel. Mix of EPMP 1000/200/300 SMs >> >> EPMP1000/200 SMs did not have any change, either Signal or Modulation. >> EPMP300 SMs had a signal increase of 3-4db and noticeable increase in >> modulation on upstream, and a slight increase in downstream. >> >> Biggest difference is BW through the AP is up about 25% today, and Frame >> utilization is 50% less than the EPMP2k AP. Watching the BW chart in >> the AP, I don't see MU-MIMO being activated at all. >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
