Yup what josh said lol.

We tried the LTE thing and glad we switch to 450m...much easier.

-Sean


On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 4:43 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> Having done one LTE vendor and 450m the only mistake I made was not buying
> the 450m sooner.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Suite 1337
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Troy, OH 45373
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:54 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And yeah, 450m might be expensive, but so is all the LTE stuff.
>>
>> You'll max out the legal EIRP with 450m, and get 8x8 MIMO.  I think
>>
>> part of the magic with LTE is that it will connect with ridiculously
>>
>> low signal, but on a fixed system you probably won't really want the
>>
>> trashy signals anyway.
>>
>>
>> Cambium also has LTE for whatever it's worth.  The CBRS version
>>
>> is supposed to be available relatively soon (though I forget
>>
>> precisely when).
>>
>>
>> I don't know if I state it as "fewer issues since there is no
>>
>> EPC", but definitely fewer complexities and fewer things to worry
>>
>> about.  The connection from eNB to EPC has to be *pristine*,
>>
>> and the EPC comes with its own set of new terminology and new
>>
>> concepts to figure out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/11/2020 4:06 PM, Darin Steffl
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I have seen lots to people doing 450M in CBRS
>>
>> stating coverage is nearly the same as LTE but way better speeds
>>
>> and triple the aggregate capacity due to mu-mimo.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Way fewer issues too since there is no EPC. Just
>>
>> straight layer 2 with no bullshit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, 2:39 PM
>>
>> David Coudron <david.coud...@advantenon.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are looking at a new area to
>>>
>>> expand out network that has a lot more tree cover than
>>>
>>> our current footprint.   We are thinking with the
>>>
>>> combination of CBRS and LTE, that we might be able to
>>>
>>> offer better coverage than with traditional fixed
>>>
>>> wireless options.   We have started conversations with
>>>
>>> the following vendors, wondering if anyone has any hands
>>>
>>> on experience with any of them and what their
>>>
>>> impressions were:
>>>
>>>
>>> Blinq
>>>
>>>
>>> Airspan
>>>
>>>
>>> Baicells
>>>
>>>
>>> Ericsson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Ericsson equipment is in a class
>>>
>>> by itself price wise, but the others are similarly
>>>
>>> priced, and somewhere around double the price of PMP 450
>>>
>>> stuff.   Normally we would add more tower sites for
>>>
>>> better coverage, but this project will need to be done
>>>
>>> before the end of the year and building towers isn’t an
>>>
>>> option.   We have good enough spread on the towers that
>>>
>>> we think we can do this with PMP 450 APs, but are
>>>
>>> thinking we’d get even better coverage out of LTE.   Any
>>>
>>> opinions on the reliability and the manageability of the
>>>
>>> four vendors above?   Sorry for such an open ended
>>>
>>> question, but not sure what to ask to be more
>>>
>>> specific.   We know that we will have the LTE stuff to
>>>
>>> deal with like access to an EPC and so on, so not so
>>>
>>> much worried about that as more the manufacturers
>>>
>>> themselves.   Baicells concerns us as they may get
>>>
>>> lumped in with Huawei.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Coudron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> AF mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> AF mailing list
>>
>>
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> AF mailing list
>
> AF@af.afmug.com
>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to