Did you read that?  It says that more cases of COVID19 get more funding.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:10 AM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
wrote:

> Josh,
>
> I'm surprised to find you supporting my point.
>
> "The first round of grants will be distributed based on historical share
> Medicare revenue, not based on COVID-19 burden. Therefore, hard-hit states
> like New York will receive far less per COVID-19 case than most other
> states.
>
> HHS said it doled out the first slice of funding based on Medicare revenue
> to get support to hospitals as quickly as possible. The agency said
> <https://www.hhs.gov/provider-relief/index.html> the next round of grants
> "will focus on providers in areas particularly impacted by the COVID-19
> outbreak," rural hospitals and other healthcare providers that receive much
> of their revenues from Medicaid."
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >implying that there is some economic incentive to report more positive
>> cases.  As far as I can tell, this is not the case whatsoever.
>>
>>
>> https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/state-by-state-breakdown-of-federal-aid-per-covid-19-case.html
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:01 AM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Lewis, It seems that you are still implying that there is some economic
>>> incentive to report more positive cases.  As far as I can tell, this is not
>>> the case whatsoever.  That may not be your intent, but the structure of
>>> your sentence "I merely quesited about there being some misguided economic
>>> incentive, ..." vs something like " I merely quesited whether there may be
>>> some misguided economic incentive, ..." suggests that the incentive
>>> exists.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:26 AM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> <RANT>
>>>> WTF don't you people understand? How many times do I have to state I am
>>>> NOT trying to state, imply, or propagate that there is a conspiracy to
>>>> inflate, deflate, or otherwise misreport the numbers?
>>>>
>>>> I'll state again, for I hope the very last time:
>>>> Anecdotal information I have personal knowledge of to be true, that
>>>> there is over reporting in this oh so tiny subset of data. I am sure there
>>>> is misreporting of positive cases as negative. I merely quesited about
>>>> there being some misguided economic incentive, put in place with the best
>>>> intentions but possibly mistakenly incentivizing testing facilities, to
>>>> report positive cases. I have no idea why such a policy would be put in
>>>> place.
>>>>
>>>> Whatever, this whole thing has just driven people crazy.
>>>>
>>>> If you think you are gonna get sick, stay isolated. If your grandmother
>>>> is fragile, she should stay isolated. If you are healthy, or just don't
>>>> care anymore, do whatever the $%@& you want.
>>>> </RANT>
>>>> Other than that, it is going to be mighty hot out there today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to