Heinlein frequently had a Mormon character that was cast in a positive fashion. 
 I really appreciated that.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 24, 2020, at 3:15 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
> 
> Heinlein hasn’t aged as well as I would have expected.   Some great ideas 
> but the sex bits appealed a lot more to a teenage male than they do some 40 
> years later.
> 
> Asimov has held up very well - as good today as it was when it was written.
> 
> For newer SciFi:
> 
> I absolutely love Dan Simmons “Hyperion Cantos”.   A bit slow to start but a 
> fantastic work.    Don’t start it if you have other things you need to do.
> 
> The “Imperial Radch” series by Ann Leckie is also one of my very favorites.  
> A bit hard to wrap your head around at first but once you figure it out it’s 
> excellent.
> 
> If you want something that’s just a plain fun easy read - “Old Man’s War” by 
> John Scalzi is a concept straight out of Heinlein’s style, with a slightly 
> different twist on the sexuality.   
> 
> Mark
> 
>> On Jul 24, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I liked Heinlein's Starship Troopers.  
>> 
>> The idea that citizenship is not a birthright but something you earn through 
>> service to society was interesting food for thought.  It's not something we 
>> could do realistically, but it was interesting to think about.  On the other 
>> hand, the idea that every soldier takes care of his own logistics is pretty 
>> dumb though.  Heinlein must have found it objectionable to have more people 
>> in the rear echelon than you have actual fighters, but frankly modern wars 
>> are won by logistics.  Having more soldiers is irrelevant if they don't have 
>> food, ammo, clothing, and fully working equipment; and expecting every Gomer 
>> Pile to take part in every aspect of that would be dumb.
>> 
>> Puppet Masters wasn't bad either.  It spawned the whole body snatching 
>> subgenre in sci fi.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 7/24/2020 4:14 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>> I get Sinclair Lewis and Upton Sinclair confused.  Didn’t really like 
>>> either of them.  Been a while since I read any Bradbury or Heinlein.
>>>  
>>> From: Ken Hohhof
>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 2:01 PM
>>> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] bored
>>>  
>>> I talked to an old college friend the other day, he had just read and was 
>>> recommending “It Can’t Happen Here” by Sinclair Lewis.
>>>  
>>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 2:54 PM
>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] bored
>>>  
>>> Books are better.
>>> 
>>> I found the 1911 edition of the Boy Scouts Handbook enlightening.  The 
>>> views expressed by the author(s) are a glimpse into a different time.  It 
>>> also discusses survival and outdoor skills in broad terms.  If you tried to 
>>> build a bow or a log cabin from the instructions in that book you'd have to 
>>> do a lot of your own figuring to fill in the blanks, but maybe that's the 
>>> whole point, and maybe that's the piece we're missing from society today.  
>>> Like maybe the journey of figuring out the precise techniques to carve the 
>>> notches into the logs is a better experience than emulating a you-tuber who 
>>> shows you every single step.
>>> 
>>> My other recent recreational book was the National Audubon Society Field 
>>> Guide to North American Trees. I lived 40 years on this earth only ever 
>>> learning a handful of major tree types (Oak, Maple, etc).  I'm embarrassed 
>>> to say I was calling every needle leafed tree a "pine" for most of those 
>>> years.  I finally decided to educate myself on the topic.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On 7/24/2020 3:29 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>> I am not much of a sports fan... I thought.  But with no sports on I am 
>>> really missing them.  I would at times catch part of a game to pass the 
>>> time.  That option is gone for the moment and there nothing but crap on to 
>>> watch...  Need a good book I guess.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> 
>>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to