As long as they do that before people are on top. 

> On May 30, 2020, at 4:49 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I imagine they instrument the *)&%%$ out of it and have 10 (or so) 
> super-slow-mo cameras going at once to figure out what went wrong.
> 
> 
> 
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> 
> On 5/30/2020 1:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>> You learn some of the most valuable lessons from failures.  They sn4 blew 
>> up.  Sn5&6 are already built and ready to incorporate the changes that come 
>> out of this failure.  Much quicker way to develop rockets.  Make lots of 
>> them, blow up lots of them,
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On May 30, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Well, SpaceX has that Mars rocket program or whatever it is, that blew up 
>>> again yesterday.  I saw a video clip where the narrator said something like 
>>> “that wasn’t nominal”.  I’m imagining the famous film of the Hindenburg 
>>> disaster where the radio announcer says “that wasn’t nominal” instead of 
>>> “oh the humanity”.
>>>  
>>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2020 2:44 PM
>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Doug and Bob's Excellent Adventure - 2nd Try
>>>  
>>> So, my TSLA stock should be safe now...
>>>  
>>> From: Bill Prince
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2020 12:53 PM
>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Doug and Bob's Excellent Adventure - 2nd Try
>>>  
>>> It's not quite like shooting a bullet. There is a window that they can 
>>> maneuver within. It may have to do with the amount of propellant carried in 
>>> the "garage" attached to the back of the crew dragon. There also has to be 
>>> enough left in that to de-orbit.
>>> 
>>> I saw a series of diagrams somewhere (maybe on the SpaceX web site?) that 
>>> illustrated all the various maneuvers at the different stages.
>>> 
>>> The approach to the ISS is interesting in that there is an exclusion zone 
>>> of sorts all around the ISS. They need to target to outside that zone until 
>>> they make their final approach. Once they are in a parallel orbit just 
>>> outside the exclusion zone, they can rotate and maneuver into the docking 
>>> station. The crew dragon (and the cargo dragon) is that the whole operation 
>>> is autonomous.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>  
>>> On 5/30/2020 11:39 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>> Guy on radio was saying SpaceX crew capsule has to be launched at a 
>>> specific time to rendezvous with the ISS, sounds like shooting a bullet.  
>>> Same guy said Boeing design will have a wider launch window because it is 
>>> more maneuverable.  Looking at photos they don’t seem that different.  Does 
>>> this sound right?  Main difference seems to be the way they land, in water 
>>> or on land.
>>>  
>>> Not sure what happens to Boeing capsule if collapse of air travel on top of 
>>> 737 Max fiasco spells the end of Boeing as a company.
>>>  
>>> From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com On Behalf Of Bill Prince
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2020 1:25 PM
>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Doug and Bob's Excellent Adventure - 2nd Try
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 1522 EDT (AKA 3:22 PM)
>>> 
>>> 1422 CDT (AKA 2:22 PM)
>>> 
>>> 1322 MDT (AKA 1:22 PM)
>>> 
>>> 1222 PDT (AKA 12:22 PM)
>>> 
>>> If you're not on daylight saving time, you know what to do.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>  
>>> On 5/30/2020 11:18 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>> Just a reminder in case you forgot.
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to