No, it was a commentary on Potus and his news conference yesterday.   

Being serious now - if the federal government says we are still in an emergency 
near the STA’s expiration date I think we are in a good position to request an 
extension based on conditions being unchanged from the emergency that prompted 
the STA in the first place.

Mark

> On Apr 14, 2020, at 9:36 AM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I didnt see these STAs come up in any of the POTUS press conferences. You're 
> saying the oval office is involved in this?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 8:18 AM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I guess it depends on what “The president of the United States call[ing] the 
> shots” decides on when this is over.  
> 
> The bigger picture at play is this NPRM: 
> https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360940A1.pdf 
> <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360940A1.pdf>
> 
> The FCC has an open proceeding to make the STA’s the permanent law of the 
> land.   This is one of those ’never let a crisis go to waste’ moments where 
> the FCC gets to make the facts on the ground match up with something they 
> want to do anyway.
> 
> So yes, I do see this as becoming permanent, and the more use we as an 
> industry can show it being used responsibly the better.
> 
> Mark
> 
>> On Apr 14, 2020, at 8:48 AM, Steve Jones <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Are you anticipating an extension or grant of permanence?
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 6:58 AM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Some of our 450m’s have seen subtle improvements, others have been more 
>> dramatic.  Nice to have some breathing room to push AP’s from 20 to 30Mhz 
>> channels. 
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>>> On Apr 14, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Mike Meluskey <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> And they are beautiful!
>>> 8x8 MIMO for our 450m’s
>>> 
>>> On 14 Apr 2020, at 6:25, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>>> 
>>> The STA’s for the original applicants were granted with the original letter 
>>> and could be used with notification to the other license holders in the 
>>> state.  A condition of the grant was that you had to make your own 
>>> application for the STA under the company name within 10 days.   Those 
>>> applications, as best I can tell, are still working through the process 
>>> with the FCC.
>>> 
>>> Yes, they are in use.
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 13, 2020, at 10:48 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Very useful but is anyone even operational on 5.9 today? It appears the 
>>>> STA's never got granted from what I read in some other threads on here. I 
>>>> was told the FCC backed out of issuing the STA's because of some 
>>>> resistance by some group. 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:11 PM Dev <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Talking to Congress folks/WISPA about pushing to see if we could get an 
>>>> extension on the 60 day 5.9 spectrum to something more like 6-12 months, 
>>>> there seems to be an interest in raising the issue to FCC commissioners. 
>>>> Both Senator/WISPA folks want to judge how much interest there would be 
>>>> from the community. No promises, but how useful would this be for you all?
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>-- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to