I guess it depends on what “The president of the United States call[ing] the shots” decides on when this is over.
The bigger picture at play is this NPRM: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360940A1.pdf <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360940A1.pdf> The FCC has an open proceeding to make the STA’s the permanent law of the land. This is one of those ’never let a crisis go to waste’ moments where the FCC gets to make the facts on the ground match up with something they want to do anyway. So yes, I do see this as becoming permanent, and the more use we as an industry can show it being used responsibly the better. Mark > On Apr 14, 2020, at 8:48 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are you anticipating an extension or grant of permanence? > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 6:58 AM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net > <mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote: > Some of our 450m’s have seen subtle improvements, others have been more > dramatic. Nice to have some breathing room to push AP’s from 20 to 30Mhz > channels. > > Mark > >> On Apr 14, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Mike Meluskey <m...@broadband.vi >> <mailto:m...@broadband.vi>> wrote: >> >> And they are beautiful! >> 8x8 MIMO for our 450m’s >> >> On 14 Apr 2020, at 6:25, Mark Radabaugh wrote: >> >> The STA’s for the original applicants were granted with the original letter >> and could be used with notification to the other license holders in the >> state. A condition of the grant was that you had to make your own >> application for the STA under the company name within 10 days. Those >> applications, as best I can tell, are still working through the process with >> the FCC. >> >> Yes, they are in use. >> >> Mark >> >>> On Apr 13, 2020, at 10:48 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Very useful but is anyone even operational on 5.9 today? It appears the >>> STA's never got granted from what I read in some other threads on here. I >>> was told the FCC backed out of issuing the STA's because of some resistance >>> by some group. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:11 PM Dev <d...@logicalwebhost.com >>> <mailto:d...@logicalwebhost.com>> wrote: >>> Talking to Congress folks/WISPA about pushing to see if we could get an >>> extension on the 60 day 5.9 spectrum to something more like 6-12 months, >>> there seems to be an interest in raising the issue to FCC commissioners. >>> Both Senator/WISPA folks want to judge how much interest there would be >>> from the community. No promises, but how useful would this be for you all? >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>-- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
