so far 16.2 seems very stable and gets rid of all the issues 16.1.X had On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 7:19 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> There was something that stopped me from going past 16.0.1.1, I forget > what it was. Went to 16.2 betas for CBRS and now on 16.2 final. We just > deployed our first 3 GHz 450b and I think we had to use 16.2 for that, even > without CBRS. > > > > Is there a reason not to just go to 16.2? > > > > FYI, the 450b seemed fine, no surprises so far. Getting 8X both ways. > > > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Brandon Yuchasz > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 25, 2020 8:07 PM > *To:* af@af.afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450 platform and firmware 16.1.1 and 16.1.1.1 frame > utilazation issues. > > > > Just figured I would throw this on the list its already on the forums but > it cost me the better part of the day so here ya go. > > There is a bug in the 16.1.1 and 16.1.1.1 firmware that causes the frame > utilization to peg at or close to 100%. > > 16.1 works fine. > > > > Brandon > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
