Who do you have doing the engineering On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, 8:06 PM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there’s double the bandwidth or more in frequency separation between > T-R at the bucking site you should be okay. It will just be difficult to > add frequencies / new paths at that site in the future. Send me the path > data and I’ll take a quick look. > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:00 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> I realize we forced them into this situation by wanting new links >> involving 2 sites where we already have 11 GHz. >> >> >> >> One of the sites is a water tank where it might be possible to put the >> tank between the 2 dishes, but that is not the bucking site. That site is >> actually I think a Rohn 45 and the antennas would be close to each other, >> although not the same azimuth. >> >> >> >> It sounds like I should ask them to look at it again with one of the >> shorter links in 18 GHz. >> >> >> >> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Tim Hardy >> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2020 7:38 PM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] licensed link high/low question >> >> >> >> The radios certainly don’t have any isolation from this type of >> interference, so what you’re relying on is totally on the antennas - >> there’s not much FSL on these and I wouldn’t bet my life on a 2’ Category B >> to provide the kind of close-coupling loss needed on a co-located system. >> AT&T and MCI used to do it when they had completely back-to-back horns or >> ultra-high performance antennas but they provide about 80 dB of >> discrimination front-to-back. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> >> >> On Mar 13, 2020, at 8:31 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> To my knowledge the radios and dishes have enough isolation that H/L >> match at a site is not necessary unless you're almost pointing in the >> same direction with those dishes (or have a TX frequency at one site >> overlapping a RX) . The opposite polarity increases the isolation so you >> have even less worry in this case. That H/L match idea is more of a >> tendency and to simplify planning than a rule. >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, 6:52 PM Ken Hohhof, <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >> I am having some 11 GHz links coordinated and the draft PCNs they sent me >> have one site high on one link and low on the other link. They are however >> different sub bands, and one is HPOL and the other is VPOL. Does this make >> it OK? I could probably do one of the links in 18 GHz. >> >> >> >> I had internalized the idea that you never had high and low at the same >> site. >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
