I relate to "crazy explanations".  A lot of the 2nd rate IT crowd stays employed by not admitting when they don't know something. Always hit the client or boss with techno babble and they'll think you're smart, meanwhile failure to admit that their inferences have no underlying factual basis prevents them from actually growing.  The worst part is I think most of them actually believe their own BS. </high_horse>

If your client is using the CRS as a router then he'll be disappointed.  It does run RouterOS, but it's clearly marketed as a switch and has clear and well advertised limits on CPU and memory.  It's handy for that one time in 20 when you need your switch to also run an IP tunnel or provide a DHCP relay or some such

That said, yes I've had watchdog resets that go away when you disable connection tracking.  It's not necessarily RAM though because you can actually crash a CCR 1072 with a couple gigs of traffic and connection tracking turned on.  Those have 16GB of RAM and appear to be in no danger of running out of RAM when they die.  We could only guess why.  In any case if you don't need NAT or Mangle rules then you can safely disable connection tracking with no ill effects.  As you say, that might be worth a try on those 4011's.


On 3/10/2020 11:14 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

I don’t have a lot of 2011’s, but other than one that came with one Ethernet port DOA, I don’t think I’ve seen that kind of problem on that model.  And mine are outdoors in uncontrolled environments.  Well, except for one at my office.

One just general comment, are you tracking memory utilization (like graphing via SNMP)?  I have a weirdo customer who went from using Linux computers as routers to using Mikrotiks, I think CRS series.  He has his own /24 and gets portscanned like crazy and has connection tracking on. He complains that his Mikrotiks keep having to be rebooted or netinstalled and he has all sorts of crazy explanations, but I’m convinced he is just running out of memory due to his conntrack table filling up.  Not my problem though, so I’ve avoided getting sucked into it.

2011 has I think 128 MB RAM, the heavier duty Mikrotiks have somewhere around 1 – 4 GB.  I mean, I’ve still got a few smaller routers in my network like 493G and 850Gx2 and I don’t see RAM running low, but just tossing it out as a possibility.

*From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2020 6:04 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RB4011 Lockups

Stops handing out IPs and stops passing traffic.

*From:*Colin Stanners

*Sent:*Tuesday, March 10, 2020 4:09 PM

*To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group

*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] RB4011 Lockups

What kind of issue? I haven't heard model-specific bugs with those so they should "just work" forever.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, 4:57 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:

    We have been having a similar issue with a RB2011iL-iN .

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Darren Shea
    Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 3:31 PM
    To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RB4011 Lockups

    I only have one RB4011 in the field, but it seems to have a
    problem a couple
    times a year. I now have it on a remote PDU which can power-cycle
    it when it
    stops responding to pings, but if they come out with a f/w fix for
    this
    problem, I'd be very interested!

    -----Original Message-----
    From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Nate Burke
    Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2020 11:24 AM
    To: Animal Farm
    Subject: [AFMUG] RB4011 Lockups

    This week I've had 2 RB4011 Routers lockup requiring a power
    cycle. They
    were still passing some traffic, but stopped doing things like handing
    out DHCP, or responding to SNMP.  And you couldn't log into them via
    Winbox or MACNeighbor.

    One was on ROS6.44.3, the other on ROS6.45. Both of them were doing
    NAT, whereas most of my Mikrotiks are only routing.  Both of these
    locations have multiple RB4011s, and only the one doing NAT locked up.
    Nothing is recorded in the log other than the reboot.  These were both
    routers that have been installed for months. One router lockup I can
    attribute to a fluke, but 2 in the same week is worrysome.  Has
    any one
    else noticed anything?

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to