Was green packet the one with that stalker salesguy

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 5:48 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

> When we dipped our toe in the WiMAX pool (Purewave, not Cambium) one of
> the things I didn’t like was everyone wanted to sell basestations and rely
> on the WiMAX “ecosystem” to supply CPEs.  And those CPEs (like Greenpacket)
> were wimpy little things with low xmt power, small low gain antennas, and
> limited feature set.  I forget who the OEM was for Mercury’s CPEs, they
> were cute and a little better on the feature set, but still not much power
> or antenna gain.
>
>
>
> So it is good to see Cambium developing their own CPE, both 3 GHz 450, and
> cnRanger.  And not making them wimpy little things.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Matt Mangriotis via AF
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 3:59 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Cc:* Matt Mangriotis <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: Cambium LTE
>
>
>
> I completely understand your skepticism Ken. However, Cambium did design
> the 3 GHz 450m with every intention of being able to support a transition
> to LTE (specifically, as a RRH with cnRanger). The intent is for this
> device to be a fully capable 8x8 MU-MIMO. Yes, you’ve got that right
> though, you’ll need new CPE devices and a BBU for each sector.
>
>
>
> We don’t have a target date when this will be developed yet… right now,
> we’re focused on getting the cnRanger CBRS 2x2 RRH and High Gain Cat 6 CPE
> devices out in August!
>
>
>
> With respect to NLOS coverage, I will agree that 450 is not quite on par
> with some of the things that LTE brings to the table (regarding range and
> the ability to maintain the downlink). However, with the increased power
> limits of CBRS, the 450m does an admirable job. In fact, in comparing
> equipment cost and performance, I would suggest that the 450 platform
> outperforms anything out there. That is, it’s less expensive to get
> bandwidth where it needs to be (at a higher rate, and to more customers).
> If the customer density can support the cost of cnMedusa, you’re going to
> be better off from total cost of ownership (both CapEx and OpEx)
> perspective.
>
>
>
> The new 3GHz 450b High Gain has 29 dBm Tx Pwr, and a 20 dBi dish
> integrated antenna… this is pretty impressive for CBRS CPE equipment (most
> of the high gain/high power LTE stuff I see is only going to be 23 dBm Tx,
> plus 15 dBi antenna).
>
>
>
> There are several customers out there that have done these comparisons…
> hopefully, they can chime in.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2020 7:06 PM
> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* [ External ] Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE
>
>
>
> You should probably talk to someone at Cambium, unless someone here has
> already done that.  There was talk 1-2 years ago about 450m is software
> defined so maybe they could use it as a remote radio head with their
> cnRanger LTE BaseBand Unit (BBU).  It has been pretty quiet since then, but
> I haven’t been able to make it to the shows.
>
>
>
> Without an update directly from the horse’s mouth like Matt at Cambium, or
> some kind of announcement, I wouldn’t hold my breath.  Back in 2018 it was
> in the realm of “it would be nice”.  That’s pretty tentative.  Plus you’d
> still have to buy the BBU and new CPE, so it doesn’t sound like a huge
> savings anyway, still 2/3 of a forklift upgrade.  I mean, if it turned out
> that the 3 GHz cnRanger RRH was literally a 450m, that would probably be
> the best case, but how likely do you think that is?
>
>
>
> This is just my personal speculation, if it’s an important part of a
> decision you’re making now, you probably need to get hold of your Cambium
> regional sales manager, or the 450 or cnRanger product manager.  If you’re
> going to WISPAmerica, you can probably do it there.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2020 6:03 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE
>
>
>
> So the 450M is supposed to be LTE upgradable?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 3:45 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Something aboit the medusa top can be used with cnranger potentially with
> a fiber run and a software update
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 3:38 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In my opinion, 450 is better than Baicells or Telrad LTE at everything
> except NLOS performance.
>
> ....Except that NLOS performance is so useful that one can be tempted to
> ignore all of the other features of the 450.  I do understand that tradeoff
> because I've had to make it myself.
>
>
>
> On 2/24/2020 4:30 PM, David Williamson wrote:
>
> 450 3.65Ghz vs. Baicells 3.65Ghz LTE = no comparison.  All but one of the
> 450 APs are already removed from our network.  I am just trying to
> determine if the SMs will be usable on Cambium LTE once they roll it out,
> or if it will require a completely different SM.
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> *From:* AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com <af-boun...@af.afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2020 4:28 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE
>
>
>
> Why are you getting rid of 3.65 Cambium in favor of LTE?
>
> On Monday, February 24, 2020, David Williamson <
> dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com> wrote:
>
> Will the Cambium 3.65 LTE have a completely new SM or will it use the
> existing 450SM's?  Trying to determine if I should keep our 450SM's or just
> go ahead and sell them to one of our secondary market distributors along
> with our 450 AP's.
>
> Thanks!
>
> David Williamson
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 1:57 PM
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE
>
> I think I heard next quarter for the 3.5.
>
> On 2/24/2020 1:48 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:
> > 3.5 isn’t available yet.
> >
> > I believe that 2.5 can be purchased.
> >
> > Jeff Broadwick
> > CTIconnect
> > 312-205-2519 Office
> > 574-220-7826 Cell
> > jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
> >
> >> On Feb 24, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Avatar Davis <acd...@mail.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Does anyone have experience with Cambium LTE? I am highly dissatisfied
> with my current manufacturer and was wondering if anyone had experience
> using/demoing their product line. Cambium products seem consistently good
> in my experience.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> AF mailing list
> >> AF@af.afmug.com
> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280372524&sdata=sDEJMwg%2FrUeE9YW6GqIDR1XzERRWkE%2F6XePPnWoPmRg%3D&reserved=0>
> >
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280382518&sdata=pP5xMGSatWmczFjAPjC1wEXnNEcBOceklsDEIeHxs6c%3D&reserved=0>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280382518&sdata=pP5xMGSatWmczFjAPjC1wEXnNEcBOceklsDEIeHxs6c%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280392515&sdata=%2BbZTwYPdzPsYWDRGoWDCC16Kx5oRKh7VKuFLS8xZ%2Bek%3D&reserved=0>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> <https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faf.afmug.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Faf_af.afmug.com&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cb86add20912747adc42b08d7b98f079e%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C0%7C0%7C637181896280392515&sdata=%2BbZTwYPdzPsYWDRGoWDCC16Kx5oRKh7VKuFLS8xZ%2Bek%3D&reserved=0>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to