Hello Danial, Since I'm always grouping together operations of the same type, what is the benefit of using MutateJobService against ordinary service mutate (except asynchronicity)?
Here is how I create full campaigns: 1. create (N) campaigns using a single MutateJobService job 2. having (M) ad-groups per campaign create (N * M) ad-groups in a single MutateJobService job (using campaign-ids from step 1) 3. having 1 ad & 1 keyword per ad-group create (N * M) ads in a single MutateJobService job & (N * M) keywords in a single MutateJobService job (using ad-group-ids from step 2) >From your response I understand that: - for step 2 create (N) MutateJobService jobs with (M) ad-groups each (grouped by campaign-id) - for step 3 create (N * M) MutateJobService jobs with 1 ad each & (N * M) MutateJobService jobs with 1 keyword each. Am I right? If so then it looks like there will be a lot of jobs running (millions for our volume). Thanks, George -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
