Stephan is 100% correct. Aggregated numbers are great for simple reports, but a lot of us (especially agencies) need to see data at the detail level.
So, can you explain comment about looking into putting back this functionality? What exactly is that referring to - do you mean the "content" keyword with the 3000000 ID? Seeing as how the data being attributed to that keyword (which is a legacy artifact from old reporting systems when placement reports didn't even exist) has been slowly disappearing since February, that's hard to believe! I for one would rather see you get rid of it completely and forever, but also get the data in the placement reports correct (ie, the Other Domains data) so that they add up correctly. It is really useful to have the detail data for the display network, and not just a lump sum "content" keyword data at the adgroup level - but only if the numbers are correct. -reed -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
