The IBM one, the reason I said overhead and complexity 1) We have 40 VTL's for 2) 5120 Configured Vtape Drives 3) More than 10,000 TSM Tape Drive Paths 4) 100 TSM Instances that share all the above
It would "seem" that if we used a VTL that has NFS we would still have 40 Devices but not he 15K objets to manage (tape Drives and paths) Regards, Charles -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of bkupmstr Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:19 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] RMAN direct to NFS Chart2: what Vtl are you currently using and what does it cause a lot of overhead and complexity? +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by bkupm...@yahoo.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
