FWIW, we use multiple networks for TSM backups/archives - and we use DNS. My TSM server is columbia; it also answers to columbia-pri (our 'private' network for SAP only); columbia-adm (administrative); columbia-bu1, columbia-bu2, columbia-bu3, and columbia-bu4 (gigabit dedicated backup networks). In addition we use CNAMES in our DNS that point to the columbia names. All our DSM.SYS entries reference the cnames, so we can move to a new TSM server any time we want just by changing the cname entries in DNS.
The primary network uses the 10.x.y.z address range; all the others are from 192.168.y.z. Tom -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:06 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Expiration on a Test server We don't use DNS references. We use specific IP addresses to force communications onto a private connection/subnet between the servers. Sounds like I need to go with the "unplug from the network" method before I start the server up and run the expire. Thanks for all the feedback. I am glad I asked. Richard Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> 08/15/2008 10:54 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Expiration on a Test server This is exactly what I do when testing a new TSM upgrade. I restore a DB to our test server, but before starting it I put bogus entries in the /etc/hosts file for each of our production tsm instances and AIX servers, including the library manager (we have dns aliases for each TSM instance). That way the test system is completely isolated with no chance of trying to contact a production server. TEST BY TRYING TO PING the production servers/instances!!!!! We use AIX. One thing to watch our for is that the default lookup order is DNS first, hosts file second. (at that's how our systems were) I had to change the search order in the /etc/netsvc.conf file to do local search first, then DNS. Rick "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 08/15/2008 10:37:46 AM: > When we did our upgrade testing we did not allow the test server to talk > to the production server by creating a false entry in the hosts file. > We also did not allow our test server to connect to the libraries. This > may be the paranoid approach, but we did not break anything. > ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.