another very usefull commands in this context are "restore volume" and/or "restore stg" I love this two very much and highly appreciate related TSM concepts :-) Juraj
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Mitch Sako [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. März 2004 23:02 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Retiring LTO tapes I share the same policy. If I see any sort of error on a tape that looks like it's jeopardizing the repository, I immediately move the data off using 'move data' or worst case I delete the volume using discard=yes. The absolute worst possible thing I can think of is going to restore someone's file and finding out that it's unavailable for some reason. That's my biggest nightmare, and luckily in my 15+ years of using ESMS/WDSF/ADSM/TSM that has not happened yet. The cost of the tape or the time needed to get rid of it is minuscule compared to the value of a file that a user wants back really badly and can't have back because it's not backed up reliably. At 3/11/2004 07:41 AM Thursday, you wrote: >I have not found a useful policy. If I start getting write errors on tapes >I make them a candidate for retirement, no matter how new or old they are.
