Matt, I had your problem often in the last year! >From time to time a new update of the servercode expired the old system objects (only happened on windows 2000 servers with active directory!!!) properly but then they started to grow again. The first server I found that really solved the Problem is the newest one (5.1.5.2)!
hope that helps you out.. those system objects caused me major problems in the last year regards, Manuel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:41 PM Subject: Cleanup backupgroups, system objects > We assumed we had the dreaded "system objects" problem because we > were running 4.2.2.0, we have a bunch of Windows clients, and our > database was growing at a rate that we didn't like. > > So a couple of days ago, we upgraded to 4.2.3, and ran CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS. > It didn't seem to accomplish anything. It finshed fairly quickly, > compared to some of the reports I've read here, and finished with the > message: > > ANR4730I CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS evaluated 28729 groups and deleted 0 > orphan groups with 0 group > members deleted with completion state 'FINISHED'. > > > Somebody on this list suggested using the command > QUERY OCC * "SYSTEM OBJECT" > > to get an idea of how bad the problem was. I tried that, before and > after the upgrade, and got the same result: zip > > tsm: UKCCSERVER1>QUERY OCC * "SYSTEM OBJECT" > ANR2034E QUERY OCCUPANCY: No match found using this criteria. > ANS8001I Return code 11. > > > This doesn't seem to make sense to me, because if I pick a client at > random and issue a query occ for that client, I see some system > object filespaces. > > tsm: UKCCSERVER1>q occ grabthar * > > Node Name Type Filespace FSID Storage Number of > Physical Logical > Name Pool Name Files > Space Space > > Occupied Occupied > > (MB) (MB) > ---------- ---- ---------- ----- ---------- --------- > --------- --------- > GRABTHAR Bkup \\grabtha- 1 BACKUPOFF- 11 > 0.03 0.03 > r\f$ SITE > GRABTHAR Bkup \\grabtha- 1 BACKUPONS- 11 > 0.03 0.03 > r\f$ ITE > GRABTHAR Bkup \\grabtha- 2 BACKUPOFF- 698,512 > 115,597.0 115,411.1 > r\e$ SITE > 8 5 > GRABTHAR Bkup \\grabtha- 2 BACKUPONS- 698,512 > 115,987.1 115,411.1 > r\e$ ITE > 8 9 > GRABTHAR Bkup \\grabtha- 3 BACKUPOFF- 20,558 > 4,651.16 4,570.71 > r\c$ SITE > GRABTHAR Bkup \\grabtha- 3 BACKUPONS- 20,558 > 4,642.22 4,570.71 > r\c$ ITE > GRABTHAR Bkup SYSTEM 4 BACKUPOFF- 106,465 > 13,598.76 13,598.76 > OBJECT SITE > GRABTHAR Bkup SYSTEM 4 BACKUPONS- 106,465 > 13,598.76 13,598.76 > OBJECT ITE > > > The pieces just don't seem to be fitting together. What am I missing? > -- > > > Matt Simpson -- OS/390 Support > 219 McVey Hall -- (859) 257-2900 x300 > University Of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > mainframe -- An obsolete device still used by thousands of obsolete > companies serving billions of obsolete customers and making huge obsolete > profits for their obsolete shareholders. And this year's run twice as fast > as last year's.
