This is only with one server.There are several servers with several clients
in this environment.
I think what should matter is db size that not only depends on no: of
clients,but also on amount of data changed
during backup.There is a formula in Tivoli Implementation Red Book.
I also use EMC Semmetrix where u don't require even to mirror/stripping.
Its has disk cache which brings back all the data back ,in case of disk
failure.With remote disk monitoring.
Secondly it has BCVs which can recover immediately.
Recovery over network is also possible.
This is what I know that's all.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Bach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Server and Disk Pools
The two largest instances of ADSM I have backup 250 full size clients (N, L
class HP, H80, M50, mulitple processor NT)
I have never found a great way to compare database setups. # of clients is
somewhat valid ...
What limitation do you speak of?
Jeff Bach
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New Server and Disk Pools
> Importance: High
>
> Sorry for that .
> Why this limitation?
> I have 40 clients.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Bach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New Server and Disk Pools
>
>
> How many clients ... 300 ... 50 ... 100 will backup to this ADSM
> instance
> with a striped database setup?
> Jeff Bach
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:29 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: New Server and Disk Pools
> > Importance: Low
> >
> > S-80 IBM SYSTEMS
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Bach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:21 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: New Server and Disk Pools
> >
> >
> > How many multi processor clients do you run on one server with this
> setup?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:43 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: New Server and Disk Pools
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > > Use RAID 1+0 FOR PERF AND AVILABILITY.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin JF (DTI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:14 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: New Server and Disk Pools
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We do RAID on our TSM server. RAID-5 for DiskPools, RAID-1 for DB et
> > > RECLOG.
> > > By using RAID, we don't mirror our database because this become
> > redundant.
> > >
> > > JF Martin
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stephen A. Cochran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 4-Sep-01 9:56 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: New Server and Disk Pools
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm specing out a new server, and I'm wondering about disk pools. How
> do
> > > you
> > > recover from a disk failure on a disk pool? Do people use RAID on
> their
> > > disk
> > > pools?
> > >
> > > This server is for a new project to back up distributed clients all
> > around
> > > campus.
> > >
> > > Steve Cochran
> > > Dartmouth College
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> > and intended solely for the individual or entity to
> > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email
> > in error destroy it immediately.
> > **********************************************************************
