This sounds pretty good to me. If you can, I would boost your NFS thread
count past the number of CPUs that you have, since a lot of NFS is just
waiting for the disks to respond. You still need a thread for that, but it
won't consume much CPU.

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 08:27:27AM -0400, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Very interesting.  This supports my idea on how I want to layout the
> new/replacement server.  The old server is only 16-threads and certainly
> could not handle dedup (we can't afford any appliances like DD) since it is
> bucking under the current backups traffic. The new server has 72-threads as
> well as 100TB internal disk.  My idea is to use the fast internal 100TB
> disk for inbound traffic and deduping and use the 200TB NFS/ISILON for
> nextstoragepool (trying to get completely off 3592-tape storage for onsite
> backups). Plus the DB will be on SSD.
>
> Any thoughts on this configuration?
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Harris, Steven <
> steven.har...@btfinancialgroup.com> wrote:
>
> > Zoltan
> >
> > I have a similar issue TSM 7.1.1.300 AIX -> Data Domain.  Have dual 10Gb
> > links, but can only get ~4000 writes/sec and 120MB/sec throughput. AIX only
> > supports NFS3, and as others have pointed out in this forum recently, the
> > stack does not have a good reputation.
> >
> > I'm finding that the heavy NFS load has other knock on effects, e.g.
> > TSMManager keeps reporting the instance offline when it's very busy as it
> > gets a network error on some of its regular queries, but these work ok when
> > load is light.  Also getting a lot of Severed/reconnected sessions.
> > CPU/IO/Paging are not a problem.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > Steven Harris
> > TSM Admin/Consultant
> > Canberra Australia
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> > Zoltan Forray
> > Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2018 1:39 AM
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: [ADSM-L] ISILON storage/FILE DEVCLASS performance issues
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > ISP 7.1.7.300 on RHEL 6   10G connectivity
> >
> > We need some guidance on trying to figure out why ISP/TSM write perform to
> > ISILON storage (via FILE DEVCLASS) is so horrible.
> >
> > We recently attached 200TB of ISILON storage to this server so we could
> > empty the 36TB of onboard disk drives to move this server to new hardware.
> >
> > However, per my OS and SAN folks, we are only seeing 1Gbs level of data
> > movement from the ISP server.  Doing a regular file copy to this same
> > storage peaks at 10Gbs speeds.
> >
> > So what, if anything, are we doing wrong when it comes to configuring the
> > storage for ISP to use?  Are there some secret controls/settings/options to
> > tell it to use the storage at max-speeds?
> >
> > We tried changing the Est/Max capacity thinking larger files would reduce
> > the overhead of allocating new pieces constantly.  Changed the Mount Limit
> > to a bigger number.  Nothing has helped.
> >
> > Only thing uses the storage right now is migrations from the original disk
> > stgpool.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Zoltan Forray*
> > Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon
> > Monitor Administrator VMware Administrator Virginia Commonwealth University
> > UCC/Office of Technology Services www.ucc.vcu.edu zfor...@vcu.edu -
> > 804-828-4807 Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable
> > organizations will never use email to request that you reply with your
> > password, social security number or confidential personal information. For
> > more details visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/
> >
> >
> > This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or
> > otherwise protected from disclosure. You should immediately delete the
> > message if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this
> > email by mistake please delete it from your system; you should not copy the
> > message or disclose its content to anyone.
> >
> > This electronic communication may contain general financial product advice
> > but should not be relied upon or construed as a recommendation of any
> > financial product. The information has been prepared without taking into
> > account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider
> > the Product Disclosure Statement relating to the financial product and
> > consult your financial adviser before making a decision about whether to
> > acquire, hold or dispose of a financial product.
> >
> > For further details on the financial product please go to
> > http://www.bt.com.au
> >
> > Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Zoltan Forray*
> Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> Xymon Monitor Administrator
> VMware Administrator
> Virginia Commonwealth University
> UCC/Office of Technology Services
> www.ucc.vcu.edu
> zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
> Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skyl...@u.washington.edu)
-- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
-- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
-- University of Washington School of Medicine

Reply via email to