On 13.1.2017. 13:42, Conny Landstedt wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, that is possible, we did just that when we went from our old environment > to our new container based.
Thank you - that is great news :-) Best regards, -- Sasa Drnjevic www.srce.unizg.hr > Our new primary server had container and file storage pools, the secondary > server acting as target for replication only had a container storage pool. > > We migrated from our old environment into the file pool since support to > migrate to a container pool was not supported at the time. That file pool was > then replicated using replicate node to our secondary server. > > Best regards > Conny Landstedt > > ***** > > On 13.1.2017. 9:17, Conny Landstedt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The same target container pool for both PROTECT STG and REPLICATE >> NODE, otherwise the whole concept of combining them fails. >> >> This IBM Technote goes further into the matter >> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21978041 >> >> Best regards Conny Landstedt > > > Hi, > and thank you for the link. > > The following is clearly stated in that IBM Technote: > > "It is perfectly possible to replicate objects from a source container pool > to a target traditional VOLUME based storage pool (such as tape)." > > > My question - is it possible to replicate the other way around? > > From traditional VOLUME based storage pool as a source to a target container > pool? > > At the moment we are replicating from a traditional VOLUME based storage pool > (DISK and TAPE) to another remote location traditional DISK based storage > pool. > > But, I would like to replace the target stg pool with the container pool to > save disk space at the remote location. > > Thank you. > > -- > Sasa Drnjevic > www.srce.unizg.hr > > > > > > > > >> >> **** >> >> Hi to all >> >> A question to people using PROTECT STG and REPLICATE NODE what will >> be the best practice to use in the target side for STGPOOL >> >> One STG for the protect stg and another STG for the replicate nodes , >> or only one for everything ??? >> >> Both TSM servers version 7.1.7 with O.S Windows 2012 64B >> >> Best Regards >> >> Robert >>
