hi tli, >> i can certainly understand your desire for geographic aggregation in >> this case. those are some long thin wires. though i note that geo >> aggregation has not worked out in the past. and i still have the >> bad taste of the ipv6 attempt in my mouth. >> >> but do you think there is real hope that, in this case, the cost of >> moving from one location to another makes moving so rare that it >> will dwarf the painful renumebering problem? is aggregation worth >> the renumbering pain? > > Yes, I think that anyone changing planets will not care about > renumbering.
and the elbonian, tralfamdorian, and barsoomian expeditionary forces will share the mars address block(s)? will all three announce the /42, or will they deaggregate? randy, who dreads travel time and costs to your address policy meetings :) ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
