Hello. I strongly oppose this proposal. Why there are no proposal with increasing IPv4 Allocations to /19, for example? Why many years ago new LIRs get /19 for free, but today we need to reduce new members?
Let check how many IPv4 not announce by BGP or return 250.0.0.0/8 to the free pool. BR, Alexey Galaev +7 985 3608004, http://vpsville.ru http://cloudville.ru ----- Исходное сообщение ----- От: "Marco Schmidt" <[email protected]> Кому: "address-policy-wg" <[email protected]> Отправленные: Понедельник, 4 Февраль 2019 г 15:04:26 Тема: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24) Dear colleagues, A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-02, "Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24" is now available for discussion. This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-02 As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the proposer. At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal. We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <[email protected]> before 5 March 2019. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Officer
