Q Misell <q=40as207960....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Given this it's pretty much up to you. If you don't feel very strongly
    > about it leave it as "dtn-nodeid-01", otherwise changing it to
    > "bp-nodeid-00" also seems fine to me.

While the thing being authorized is a DTN BundleEID, it seems that the
transport used for this challenge is BP.  So this is akin to http-01.
I would call it bp-nodeid-00.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to