Q Misell <q=40as207960....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Given this it's pretty much up to you. If you don't feel very strongly > about it leave it as "dtn-nodeid-01", otherwise changing it to > "bp-nodeid-00" also seems fine to me.
While the thing being authorized is a DTN BundleEID, it seems that the transport used for this challenge is BP. So this is akin to http-01. I would call it bp-nodeid-00. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org