All, I have asked for a short slot at the IETF 121 ACME WG meeting but I will pose this question ahead on the mailing list:
The current DTN Node ID validation draft [1] uses validation method name "dtn-nodeid-01" but this is slightly inconsistent with the existing registered validation method names [2] in that the first part of the name is neither a protocol (e.g. "dns" or "http") nor a transport type (e.g. "email") name. For consistency's sake because this validation method is strongly influenced by the email validation of RFC 8823 and uses BPv7 as its challenge/response transport should it instead be named something like "bp-nodeid-00"? This numbering would also hint at the category of the draft being experimental. There is little installed base for this method so adjusting the name will not have an affect outside of prototypes. But this also might be something better seen as happening before IESG review. I don't have strong opinions about this other than wanting to be consistent with the other method names. Any thoughts? Brian S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/ [2] https://www.iana.org/assignments/acme/acme.xhtml#acme-validation-methods
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
