FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. Thank you.
RFC Editor/rv > On Jun 29, 2024, at 1:15 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555, > "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8010 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: stephanie martinez <sm9538...@gmail.com> > > Section: global > > Original Text > ------------- > certification was completed a few years ago and the people aren't the > intended source etc > > Corrected Text > -------------- > new keys should have been given along time ago and problem shouldn't have to > be given issues. > > Notes > ----- > correct all erratas as i found well over 13 of them concerning this area and > many others. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) > Publication Date : March 2019 > Author(s) : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Automated Certificate Management Environment > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org