FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv


> On Jun 29, 2024, at 1:15 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8010
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: stephanie martinez <sm9538...@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: global
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> certification was completed a few years ago and the people aren't the 
> intended source etc 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> new keys should have been given along time ago and problem shouldn't have to 
> be given issues.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> correct all erratas as i found well over 13 of them concerning this area and 
> many others.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to