I was reading the accepted errata, and I noticed the ones about the HTTP
request line.
But... I don't think that concept really applies to versions past HTTP/1.1.
Then, I thought, well maybe they cite HTTP/1.1 directly. But I think
the draft doesn't normatively cite an HTTP RFC (I looked, maybe I missed
it). It does cite RFC 2818, but this is obsoleted by RFC 9110.
I also this erratum about a JSON response body of "{}". Isn't this response
served over clear text? I think an update should confront this
bootstrapping problem.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5729
thanks,
Rob
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
