> On Jul 2, 2019, at 07:04, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > > If no Cache-Control header(s) were received, the client MUST > act as if "Cache-Control: no-cache" was received.
If this is a MUST, the server should be sending it, perhaps. > If the directory object is no longer fresh, the client MUST access the > directory again > (by sending another GET request to the directory URL) and then use the > updated directory object. Unless the server sent a 304 response, wouldn’t the client just have gotten the object contents in the first request? Ask _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
