I believe it's a theoretical concern at this point. On 04/07/2019 09:09, [email protected] wrote: > >> Am 03.07.2019 um 15:43 schrieb Rob Stradling <[email protected]>: >> >> The idea behind the erratum is to force HTTP caching rules to apply to >> directory objects, so that servers can update their directory objects >> and expect clients to take note. > > Is this a theoretical concern or do you have examples where current clients > cache directory information that would harm a server update? > > Cheers, Stefan >
-- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist Sectigo Limited _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
