Hi Rich, > On 25/04/2017 19:14, "Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have recently published [1] and started implementing it. > > > > The plan is to get the code running ASAP (surely before Prague) and, if the > > experiment is satisfactory, ask for adoption. > > > > Cheers, t > > > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-acme-star-00 > > Since the https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts > is being taken up in TLS, it might make sense for this draft to go there, > too. But we can see.
I'm not sure that would be a feasible solution: the most obvious reason being it'd require an extreme charter-stretching exercise. Besides, STAR includes an extension of ACME, thus the ACME WG looks to me like the obvious place where to host this work. Cheers, t _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
