So we submitted a draft to define a new challenge type to support the ATIS/SIP Forum NNI task group (SHAKEN) requirements, which are based on using protocols defined in STIR: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barnes-acme-service-provider/
It's not clear to me this would need to be a WG document to progress, but ideally we want this published as people are implementing it. Regards, Mary. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > Having talked with the authors, we expect the base ACME draft to be ready > for WGLC at least a month before the next IETF meeting. > > > > The CAA document, which we adopted, is very short and straightforward and > seems like it can be handled easily over email. > > > > Does anyone have any new work items that would be ready to discuss in > July? Any rechartering discussion that looks promising? If so, please > post to the mailing list soon. > > > > Thanks, > > Rich and Ted’s Excellent ACME Adventure > > > > > > -- > > Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies > > Member, OpenSSL Dev Team > > IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz > > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
