Ok, then I understand. This should work. Thanks.
//Zahed On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:23 PM Dan Garcia Carrillo <garcia...@uniovi.es> wrote: > Hi, > > We commented to all the input on the comments, we were about to update > the next version of the draft. > > The text to be added will be > > ## Expert Review Instructions > > The IANA registries established in this document are defined as > "Specification Required", "Private Use", "Standards Action with > Expert Review" and "Specification Required". > This section provides general guidelines for what experts should > focus on, but as they are designated experts for a reason, they should > be granted flexibility. > > - When defining the use of CoAP-EAP Information Elements: Experts are > expected to evaluate how the values are defined, their scope, and > whether they align with CoAP-EAP's functionality and constraints. They > are expected to assess if the values are clear, well-structured, and > follow CoAP and CoAP-EAP conventions, such as concise encoding for > constrained environments. They should ensure these IEs can seamlessly > integrate with existing CoAP implementations and extensions. It is also > expected that they verify if IE values are protected from unauthorized > modification or misuse during transmission. > > Best regards, > > Dan. > > > > On 11/12/24 12:19, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote: > > Thanks for letting me know. However, I have not noticed any updated > > instructions for DEs in the IANA considerations (sub) sections. Where > > have you updated ? > > -- > Dan García Carrillo > > --------------------- > Departamento de Informática, Área de Telemática, Universidad de Oviedo > 2.7.8 - Escuela Politécnica de Ingeniería, 33204, Campus de Viesques, Gijón > Tel.: +34 985182654 (Ext. 2654) | email: garcia...@uniovi.es > >
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list -- ace@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ace-le...@ietf.org
