Hi,
We commented to all the input on the comments, we were about to update
the next version of the draft.
The text to be added will be
## Expert Review Instructions
The IANA registries established in this document are defined as
"Specification Required", "Private Use", "Standards Action with
Expert Review" and "Specification Required".
This section provides general guidelines for what experts should
focus on, but as they are designated experts for a reason, they should
be granted flexibility.
- When defining the use of CoAP-EAP Information Elements: Experts are
expected to evaluate how the values are defined, their scope, and
whether they align with CoAP-EAP's functionality and constraints. They
are expected to assess if the values are clear, well-structured, and
follow CoAP and CoAP-EAP conventions, such as concise encoding for
constrained environments. They should ensure these IEs can seamlessly
integrate with existing CoAP implementations and extensions. It is also
expected that they verify if IE values are protected from unauthorized
modification or misuse during transmission.
Best regards,
Dan.
On 11/12/24 12:19, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. However, I have not noticed any updated
instructions for DEs in the IANA considerations (sub) sections. Where
have you updated ?
--
Dan García Carrillo
---------------------
Departamento de Informática, Área de Telemática, Universidad de Oviedo
2.7.8 - Escuela Politécnica de Ingeniería, 33204, Campus de Viesques, Gijón
Tel.: +34 985182654 (Ext. 2654) | email: garcia...@uniovi.es
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list -- ace@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ace-le...@ietf.org
