I would look at the source code as to why it works that way... As to precisely where to look, I am uncertain.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024, 10:18 AM <kalter...@gmail.com> wrote: > Suppose I have one window opened, and it has a single zeroxed clone > of it. If I run X +#1, I'd expect it to move the cursor in both > windows. Instead, it only touches one of them. > > Acme does just the same. > > Is there any particular reason it works this way? > > A note on why it could be useful. Basically, it's modern multi-cursor > editing. One cursor = one Zerox. The main usefulnes is it replaces > delicate x// y// commands with more interactive cursoring around. > > It's even more powerful than modern editing, since it's backed by > regular expressions, not just keyboard input. > > *9fans <https://9fans.topicbox.com/latest>* / 9fans / see discussions > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans> + participants > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/members> + delivery options > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription> Permalink > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tccea439a6627e81b-M5d199a7b6d4ee3098ce46cc0> > ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tccea439a6627e81b-M44abe0fc02060f173001a00c Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
