he already admitted he's using grammarly.
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 7:00 PM Noam Preil <n...@pixelhero.dev> wrote:
>
> There's a clear pattern, though. The document is blatantly AI-generated,
> and I believe that the author acknowledged it as such ("the model was
> confirmed as trained on 9front sources"); even if it wasn't, the logical
> mistakes it makes are of a type humans don't generally make.
>
> The author has many posts that _all_ feature A.I. art. The arguments
> they make have no connection to the premises, although in fairness
> that's a hallmark of bad human writing too. The sources cited have no
> connection to the arguments being made.
>
> It is not unreasonable to assume that someone who is clearly relying so
> heavily on LLMs might be doing so on the mailing list when so many of
> their posts clearly resemble LLM output.
>
> Hell, even if they're not using an LLM, if someone is writing with the
> _quality_ of an LLM, they're not worth engaging with. "This horrible
> spam-looking content was actually written by a person!" is not a great
> defense.
>
> - Noam Preil
>
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te051f230f2656bbb-Mc1fc467d8d7d7b1873d3fc6f
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
