On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:56 PM ibrahim via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: > > > On Monday, 13 May 2024, at 4:39 PM, Jacob Moody wrote: > > Fine my dude, you don't have to call us Plan 9, you don't have to want to use > our code. However I ask that you be mindful in how you talk to new users and > don't assume that they have this same level of care for authenticity and > "pure" code origins as you. > > > You should read more carefully what I replied to the new user. It had nothing > to do with licenses at all. I drew a path which spares him the frustrations > during the time where he gets used to the system. And using 9vx is one way to > set one step after the other. I'm wondering why you don't adjust it so that > 9front can also be run there. As far as I can tell from once experimenting > the reason why 9front doesn't run are your extensions to the kernel > interface. 9vx is by far a better more plan9-ish way to virtualize under > linux. But thats your decision. The path I suggested is the simplest one at > least I think so. It takes less than 30 min to have a running plan9 > installation without any problems arising from file servers without the > problems of networking or data exchange. If you really believe that the path > I suggested was a bad one or isn't simpler than directly using on of the > plan9 distros I would really be surprised. This new guy has to learn rc, > acme, rio, about plan9.ini about mouse shortcuts in acme. And do you really > believe doing this directly on 9legacy or 9front is simpler than by using 9vx > ? > > If this guy reaches the 4.step he will find his own path to whatever fork he > pleases. So where exactly was my reply mindless ? > > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options Permalink
no ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te051f230f2656bbb-Mfd2a21c2adc4b2b4c023bb8b Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
