> > As I interpret it, we'd need Nokia to re-release Plan 9 under a Lucent > > Public License version 1.03 which would be the MIT license for > > contributions to be relicensed (if I'm interpreting it correctly the > > GPL release of Plan 9 couldn't apply to contributions either.) > > I Am Not A Lawyer, and I don't doubt that the P9 foundation can > get good lawyers. But, once _ownership_ of the copyright was transferred > to the P9F, they can do what they want with it, including publishing > under the MIT license. There should not be a need to involve Nokia > any further.
The problem is Nokia doesn't own the contributions, so they can't transfer them to the P9F, but the LPL says they have the right to update the LPL, or was this right transferred to the P9F too? ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf20bce89ef96d4b6-M7e5a88170abbdbfb848f91c8 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
