"Anonymous AWK fan via 9fans" <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: > As I interpret it, we'd need Nokia to re-release Plan 9 under a Lucent > Public License version 1.03 which would be the MIT license for > contributions to be relicensed (if I'm interpreting it correctly the > GPL release of Plan 9 couldn't apply to contributions either.)
I Am Not A Lawyer, and I don't doubt that the P9 foundation can get good lawyers. But, once _ownership_ of the copyright was transferred to the P9F, they can do what they want with it, including publishing under the MIT license. There should not be a need to involve Nokia any further. My two cents. And apologies - I don't mean to start a long discussion about licensing. I'd rather let P9F worry about it (and throw a few $$ at them to help). I suggest we all do the same. :-) Arnold ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf20bce89ef96d4b6-Meba469dccfec41bd213492f7 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
