I see I'd misapplied the rule in walk(5) so fossil is fine. It has to do with searching from . when you are there, which makes sense, not when entering the directory from its parent, so ignore that part of my earlier post.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:13 AM Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> wrote: > "search" is exactly the wrong word for what this bit does, because if you >> don't have "search" permission, the one thing you can still do is look at >> the names. > > > in ramfs, but that's a bug that no-one had noticed > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:05 AM <o...@eigenstate.org> wrote: > >> >>> So, cd'ing into a directory withut +x leads >> >>> to an inescapabler trap. >> >> ... >> >> fossil just moved up another notch in my estimation because directory >> search restriction is so broken. >> > >> > o...@eigenstate.org, what version of fossil were your experiments done >> on? >> > My observations are different: >> > >> > term% mkdir -p d/a/b >> > term% touch d/x >> > term% chmod -x d >> > term% ls -ld d >> > d-rw-r--r-- M 12 miller miller 0 Jun 7 16:38 d >> > term% cd d >> > term% cd .. >> > term% ls d >> > d/a >> > d/x >> > term% >> > >> > No trap that I can see here. >> >> cwfs, but -- yeah, it's enforced inconsistently across >> different file systems. (of course). >> ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tdd7a9b1b32d01f54-M39749150e29409f155014124 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
