> > "search" is exactly the wrong word for what this bit does, because if you > don't have "search" permission, the one thing you can still do is look at > the names.
in ramfs, but that's a bug that no-one had noticed On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:05 AM <o...@eigenstate.org> wrote: > >>> So, cd'ing into a directory withut +x leads > >>> to an inescapabler trap. > >> ... > >> fossil just moved up another notch in my estimation because directory > search restriction is so broken. > > > > o...@eigenstate.org, what version of fossil were your experiments done > on? > > My observations are different: > > > > term% mkdir -p d/a/b > > term% touch d/x > > term% chmod -x d > > term% ls -ld d > > d-rw-r--r-- M 12 miller miller 0 Jun 7 16:38 d > > term% cd d > > term% cd .. > > term% ls d > > d/a > > d/x > > term% > > > > No trap that I can see here. > > cwfs, but -- yeah, it's enforced inconsistently across > different file systems. (of course). > ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tdd7a9b1b32d01f54-M8e0db3a8ea1ca83dc1cd64b9 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
