> It is the Plan 9 Way (TM) to avoid > nested inclusion of header files,
$ arch/dat.h includes port/portdat.h in kernel. Exempted too? Álvaro Jurado Cuevas http://colmenar.biz.tm El 30/05/2015 07:11, <lu...@proxima.alt.za> escribió: > > Which version? > > > > "The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in > > <sys/types.h>." in issue 6 > > > > "The <sys/wait.h> header shall define the id_t and pid_t types as > > described in <sys/types.h>." in issue 7 > > > > in the sys/wait.h part of the headers section of base definitions > > I haven't looked at cinap's work, but... > > It is the Plan 9 Way (TM) to avoid nested inclusion of header files, > although I guess the APE may be exempted. I also appreciate that > adding conditional definitions of id_t and pid_t in <sys/wait.h> that > match those in <sys/types.h> could lead to eventual inconsistencies, > but I would still prefer to follow the Plan 9 guidelines. > > But without a more formal code review structure and the apparent > absence of guidance from Bell Labs, I suppose I'm just farting in the > wind. > > Lucio. > > >
