> Which version? > > "The id_t and pid_t types shall be defined as described in > <sys/types.h>." in issue 6 > > "The <sys/wait.h> header shall define the id_t and pid_t types as > described in <sys/types.h>." in issue 7 > > in the sys/wait.h part of the headers section of base definitions
I haven't looked at cinap's work, but... It is the Plan 9 Way (TM) to avoid nested inclusion of header files, although I guess the APE may be exempted. I also appreciate that adding conditional definitions of id_t and pid_t in <sys/wait.h> that match those in <sys/types.h> could lead to eventual inconsistencies, but I would still prefer to follow the Plan 9 guidelines. But without a more formal code review structure and the apparent absence of guidance from Bell Labs, I suppose I'm just farting in the wind. Lucio.
