> In its own niche is the important point here. Just because writing a > kernel or system utilities can be done in Go doesn't mean it should > be. Go isn't even totally stable or feature complete on Plan 9 at > this point. You get the same shit in C on Plan 9 as you do Go plus > it's more stable and has better support. At this point I would say > keep using C unless you have some specific need to use Go on Plan 9.
if you rewrote a kernel in go, i don't think you'd want something that is exactly plan 9. - erik
