On May 17, 2013, at 11:51, lamg <gort.andres...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it will be nice for Plan9 having such language-compiler, Go
> has proved to be an improvement over C in its own niche.
> 

In its own niche is the important point here. Just because writing a kernel or 
system utilities can be done in Go doesn't mean it should be. Go isn't even 
totally stable or feature complete on Plan 9 at this point. You get the same 
shit in C on Plan 9 as you do Go plus it's more stable and has better support.
At this point I would say keep using C unless you have some specific need to 
use Go on Plan 9.

--
Veety

Reply via email to