On Tue Feb 5 03:42:51 EST 2013, staal1...@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry if this may sound ignorant and clueless, but would a similar port of > the > Plan9 thread(2) to APE be possible - in particular in a form where stuff are > exposed through the headers as a standard pthreads solution? > > Right now I have noticed that I use GNU Pth extensively under APE, but a more > "native" pthread implementation would be cool.
we haven't investigated. you're welcome to try. the immediate goal is to get hg and python working properly on all arches we've currently got. we're desperately trying not to drag anything else along. - erik
