> I can't contain my curiosity: what's the line?
> 
> I once worked with a colleague who had a superstition that any
> one-line change to production software was almost certain to
> introduce a bug.  (Actually what he said was "one-card change",
> which indicates how long ago this was.)   If he had to make
> a modification simple enough to be done in one line, he would
> always combine it with some other random harmless change like
> renaming a variable.

This line:

http://www.9legacy.org/9legacy/patch/pc-sdata-dma-lite.diff

It enables DMA by default in the sdata driver.
But it's not a requirement. It's just a remain
of a personal taste.

Surprisingly, I have another version of this patch
which should convince your former colleague :-)

http://www.9legacy.org/9legacy/patch/pc-sdata-dma.diff

-- 
David du Colombier

Reply via email to