> I can't contain my curiosity: what's the line? > > I once worked with a colleague who had a superstition that any > one-line change to production software was almost certain to > introduce a bug. (Actually what he said was "one-card change", > which indicates how long ago this was.) If he had to make > a modification simple enough to be done in one line, he would > always combine it with some other random harmless change like > renaming a variable.
This line: http://www.9legacy.org/9legacy/patch/pc-sdata-dma-lite.diff It enables DMA by default in the sdata driver. But it's not a requirement. It's just a remain of a personal taste. Surprisingly, I have another version of this patch which should convince your former colleague :-) http://www.9legacy.org/9legacy/patch/pc-sdata-dma.diff -- David du Colombier