On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:50:27PM +0530, Dan Cross wrote: > > You are conflating bootstrapping the language with the language's > build system. The go command is actually quite nice. >
Also, the go command is useless unless the bootstrap build system can construct it. I'm not conflating anything, I'm just not talking about the build system you like. > The use of bash in Go is tiny. Why fixate on it when you could go > build something useful, instead? Because a corrected build system would be useful to me. Is this a complicated concept? > > Evidence suggests otherwise. > I have yet to see such. > Anyway, I have neither the time nor the inclination to get into a > pissing match with some random person on the Internet about Go's use > of bash. If it's such a serious problem for you, well, I hope you > figure out a way to work around it. If not, then I don't know what to > tell you. In either case, good luck! I wish you would have ascertained you had nothing to tell me earlier in the thread. Thank you for your support.
