On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Kurt H Maier <kh...@intma.in> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:15:35PM +0530, Dan Cross wrote:
>> Oh no, I can't. Please, by all means, point me to whatever it is that
>> you have produced that demonstrates your prowess in this area so that
>> I can learn more.
>
> you sound upset
Not at all.
> [...]
>> And yet the produced the language, and people use it. But you clearly
>> know better, so please, by all means, show me what you've produced
>> that's useful that I can learn something from.
>
> I have no urges to prove myself to you.
I see no reason to take you your opinion any more seriously than
anyone else's. You're entitled to it; that doesn't mean you are
right.
> They have produced a language, yes.
> They have not produced a worthwhile build system
You are conflating bootstrapping the language with the language's
build system. The go command is actually quite nice.
The use of bash in Go is tiny. Why fixate on it when you could go
build something useful, instead?
> or development community.
Evidence suggests otherwise.
Anyway, I have neither the time nor the inclination to get into a
pissing match with some random person on the Internet about Go's use
of bash. If it's such a serious problem for you, well, I hope you
figure out a way to work around it. If not, then I don't know what to
tell you. In either case, good luck!
- Dan C.
